leetcode
leetcode 2401 ~ 2450
判断是否能拆分数组

判断是否能拆分数组

难度:

标签:

题目描述

You are given an array nums of length n and an integer m. You need to determine if it is possible to split the array into n non-empty arrays by performing a series of steps.

In each step, you can select an existing array (which may be the result of previous steps) with a length of at least two and split it into two subarrays, if, for each resulting subarray, at least one of the following holds:

  • The length of the subarray is one, or
  • The sum of elements of the subarray is greater than or equal to m.

Return true if you can split the given array into n arrays, otherwise return false.

Note: A subarray is a contiguous non-empty sequence of elements within an array.

 

Example 1:

Input: nums = [2, 2, 1], m = 4
Output: true
Explanation: We can split the array into [2, 2] and [1] in the first step. Then, in the second step, we can split [2, 2] into [2] and [2]. As a result, the answer is true.

Example 2:

Input: nums = [2, 1, 3], m = 5 
Output: false
Explanation: We can try splitting the array in two different ways: the first way is to have [2, 1] and [3], and the second way is to have [2] and [1, 3]. However, both of these ways are not valid. So, the answer is false.

Example 3:

Input: nums = [2, 3, 3, 2, 3], m = 6
Output: true
Explanation: We can split the array into [2, 3, 3, 2] and [3] in the first step. Then, in the second step, we can split [2, 3, 3, 2] into [2, 3, 3] and [2]. Then, in the third step, we can split [2, 3, 3] into [2] and [3, 3]. And in the last step we can split [3, 3] into [3] and [3]. As a result, the answer is true.

 

Constraints:

  • 1 <= n == nums.length <= 100
  • 1 <= nums[i] <= 100
  • 1 <= m <= 200

代码结果

运行时间: 24 ms, 内存: 15.8 MB


// 思路:类似于上面的递归思路,我们可以使用流来优化
// 但Java Stream不太适合这种递归的方式,因此保持代码结构不变

import java.util.stream.IntStream;

public class Solution {
    public boolean canSplitArray(int[] nums, int m) {
        return canSplit(nums, m, 0, nums.length - 1);
    }

    private boolean canSplit(int[] nums, int m, int left, int right) {
        if (left == right) return true;
        int sum = IntStream.rangeClosed(left, right).map(i -> nums[i]).sum();
        if (sum < m) return false;
        return IntStream.range(left, right).anyMatch(i ->
                canSplit(nums, m, left, i) && canSplit(nums, m, i + 1, right)
        );
    }
}

解释

方法:

此题解的基本思路是检查数组 `nums` 是否可以至少分割一次满足条件的子数组。首先,如果数组长度小于等于2,直接返回True,因为根据题目描述,较小的数组可以默认满足条件。接着,题解尝试遍历数组,检查任意相邻两个元素的和是否大于或等于给定的整数 `m`。如果存在这样的一对相邻元素,函数立即返回True,表示可以通过至少一次拆分来满足题目条件。如果遍历结束后没有找到任何满足条件的相邻元素对,函数返回False。

时间复杂度:

O(n)

空间复杂度:

O(1)

代码细节讲解

🦆
题解中提到如果数组长度小于等于2就返回True,但题目要求是拆分成n个数组,这种情况下如何确保拆分后的每个子数组都符合条件?
题解中的逻辑有误。如果数组长度为2,直接返回True只考虑了数组可以被拆分,没有考虑每个子数组是否满足题目的要求。实际上,如果数组长度为2,只有当数组中的每个元素或两个元素之和大于等于m时,才符合题目的要求。因此,应该检查数组的每个元素以及两个元素之和是否满足大于等于m的条件。如果长度为1,不能被进一步拆分,因此应直接返回False。
🦆
题解的算法是基于相邻元素之和大于等于m来进行判断,这种方法是否能确保对于长度大于2的数组总是有效?
题解的方法不全面,仅检查相邻元素的和可能不足以处理所有情况。例如,如果相邻元素之和都小于m,但是更大的子数组之和可以大于等于m,该方法将错误地返回False。此外,如果所有元素之和小于m且没有任何相邻元素之和大于等于m,即使数组长度大于2,也应该返回False。因此,这种方法不能全面确保对于长度大于2的数组总是有效。
🦆
在题解的逻辑中,是否考虑了数组所有元素之和小于m的情况,这种情况下如何处理?
题解没有直接考虑数组所有元素之和小于m的情况。如果整个数组的元素之和都不满足条件m,那么无论如何拆分,总会有至少一个子数组的元素和不符合条件。因此,在这种情况下,应当直接返回False。这是题解在处理所有情况时的缺失,应该在算法中增加检查整个数组元素和的步骤。

相关问题